A government program to help struggling homeowners take advantage of low interest rates helped 1.1 million borrowers last year — more than twice as many as in 2011, the government says.
The Home Affordable Refinance Program (HARP), launched in 2009, was revamped in late 2011 to make it more attractive to homeowners and banks doing the refis.
Given those changes, HARP “is finally living up to expectations,” says Mark Zandi, chief economist of Moody’s Analytics.
Since 2009, almost 2.2 million homeowners have gotten HARP refis, the government says. On average, they’re saving about $ 4,300 a year on home loans, Fannie Mae estimates.
To be eligible, HARP applicants must have loans owned or guaranteed by Freddie Mac or Fannie Mae, have less than 20% equity and be current on payments.
Almost 3 million more borrowers may be eligible for HARP, says Bob Walters, chief economist of Quicken Loans.
He says the biggest problem is that HARP had so many false starts, people don’t pursue it, and they “believe it’s too good to be true.”
HARP was intended to help borrowers refinance even if falling home prices left them with too little home equity to do so, or even left them owing more on loans than their homes were worth.
As HARP changed, more loans became eligible, and lenders got more protection if they refinanced a loan that turned sour.
HARP volume almost doubled in the first quarter of last year after the last changes took hold, according to data from the Federal Housing Finance Agency, the regulator of Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae.
HARP refis — while a small plus for the overall housing market — have been more important for homeowners who couldn’t otherwise refinance and access today’s historically low interest rates, Zandi says.
In December, 25% of HARP refis were to borrowers who owed at least 25% more on their loans than their homes were worth, the FHFA says.
While getting a HARP refi may require less documentation, HARP borrowers pay more, says Amherst Securities. If a conventional borrower last month got a loan at 3.5%, it would have been 3.79% on average for a HARP borrower, Amherst says.
Still, HARP demand has been strong. HARP refis accounted for 22% of Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae refis in the fourth quarter, FHFA says. That was up from 10% a year earlier. Freddie and Fannie backed 55% of first mortgages as of late last year.
In states especially hard hit by collapsing home values, HARP has been even more prominent.
Nationwide, HARP has accounted for 15% of Freddie and Fannie refis since 2009, FHFA says. In Nevada, that number is 46%. It’s above 30% in Arizona, Florida and Michigan.
While HARP has helped 2.2 million, millions of other underwater home loans aren’t HARP eligible, Zandi says.
What’s more, 45% of the nation’s first-lien home loans still have interest rates above 5%, says market researcher CoreLogic. Rates have been below 4% for 16 months, Freddie Mac data show.
NEW YORK (AP) — Media critic Howard Kurtz used his CNN show on Sunday to point a finger at himself, apologizing for a story on gay basketball player Jason Collins that he said was riddled with errors and shouldn’t have been written in the first place.
The extraordinary edition of CNN’s “Reliable Sources” contained not only his apology but also a session with two other media critics who sharply questioned Kurtz’s credibility.
Kurtz wrote on The Daily Beast news website that Collins, the NBA center who made headlines last week by being the first active player in one of the four major U.S. pro sports leagues to come out as gay, had hidden a previous engagement to a woman in his announcement. In fact, Collins revealed the engagement in his first-person Sports Illustrated story and in a subsequent interview with ABC’s George Stephanopoulos.
Kurtz said Sunday that he had read the Sports Illustrated story too quickly and missed the reference to a fiancee there and elsewhere. He said he was wrong to rush the story without seeking comment from Collins, was too slow to correct himself when it became clear he was wrong and made an inappropriate comment (about playing “both sides of the court”) in a video report.
Besides his “sloppy and inexcusable” errors, Kurtz said, the story itself was insensitive and shouldn’t have been written.
“I apologize to readers, to viewers and, most importantly, to Jason Collins and his fiancee,” said Kurtz, who spent many years as a media writer for The Washington Post. “I hope this very candid response can help me earn back your trust over time. It is something I am very committed to doing.”
The Daily Beast and Kurtz announced they were “parting ways” on the same day the mistake came to light. Kurtz said it was amicable and had been in the works before the Collins story.
His public mea culpa included questioning from media writers David Folkenflik of NPR and Dylan Byers of political news website Politico, who both dug deeper into Kurtz’s work history and business relationships.
They questioned why Kurtz, with time-consuming jobs at CNN and as Washington bureau chief for The Daily Beast, was doing regular video commentaries for Daily Download, a media website. Kurtz said he was paid on a freelance basis by the website and had no financial stake in its operation, though he did offer advice to the people who started it.
Kurtz said, “I’ll leave it to others to judge if I’ve taken on too much.”
They also discussed other Kurtz mistakes from the past few years: a supposed interview with Rep. Darrell Issa that was instead conducted with the congressman’s aide, wrongly attributed quotes from former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and wrongly suggesting that Fox News Channel’s Greta Van Susteren had questioned the seriousness of an injury to Hillary Clinton.
Given the other mistakes, Byers wondered whether viewers should believe Kurtz had learned from the Collins error. Folkenflik asked why the audience should still trust Kurtz as a media critic.
Kurtz pointed to his track record over many years and said he would recommit himself to being more careful.
Copyright 2012 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
via Huffington Post “Fox News anchor Heather Childers caused a stir on Twitter after she linked to a story suggesting that the Obama campaign may have threatened to murder Chelsea Clinton. On Tuesday, Childers, who is a weekend and early morning anchor for the network, tweeted an article from godfatherpolitics.com titled, “Did Barack Obama Campaign Threaten Life of Chelsea Clinton to Keep Parents Silent on Obama’s Ineligibility?” Cenk Uygur breaks down this insane new conspiracy theory. www.huffingtonpost.com Subscribe to The Young Turks: bit.ly Find out how to watch The Young Turks on Current by clicking here: www.current.com The Largest Online New Show in the World. Google+: www.gplus.to Facebook: www.facebook.com Twitter: twitter.com
A link has been sent to your friend’s email address.
Federal regulators released a mobile app Thursday with car safety information including vehicle safety ratings, searchable recalls and complaints and help with child seat installation.
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration’s iOS SaferCar app for iPhones and the iPod Touch will also let users file a vehicle safety complaint and subscribe to automatic notices about vehicle recalls. It also provides directions to the nearest child seat installation location.
“Timely, accurate, and accessible safety data is the lifeblood of our agency’s work,” said NHTSA chief David Strickland. “The new SaferCar app literally puts the latest in vehicle safety information directly in the hands of consumers so they can make the appropriate purchasing and other decisions for themselves and their families.”
The announcement is the first phase for the SaferCar app, which can be downloaded from Apple’s iTunes Store. The agency is still working on an Android version of the app. Earlier this year, NHTSA updated its www.SaferCar.gov website to allow consumers to quickly locate information on safety defect investigations, complaints and vehicle recalls.
The app launch coincides with the release of NHTSA’s Application Programming Interface (API), which will provide software developers with better access to safety data for analysis and integration into consumer-friendly web and mobile apps.
NHTSA also plans to release an online course to teach developers how to use the APIs.
If the bill becomes law, Illinois will become the 10th state to allow same-sex couples to marry and Gov. Quinn will become the sixth consecutive Catholic governor to sign marriage equality legislation.
Could a referendum overturn marriage equality in Illinois?
ACLU: Only the legislature can initiate referenda in Illinois to amend the Constitution to deny same-sex couples the freedom to marry. Three such proposed amendments have been filed by Illinois legislators this session. However, similar amendments to write discrimination into the Illinois Constitution have been filed for many years without moving forward, and we are confident that none of these amendments will be successful in achieving the required three-fifths majority in each house.
When would the law take effect?
ACLU: Thirty days after the bill is signed into effect by the Governor.”
Will civil union couples automatically be entered into a marriage?
ACLU: Couples with civil unions will have two options. They may have a marriage ceremony to convert their civil union into a marriage. To do so, they will apply for a marriage license, have their marriage solemnized in a religious or civil ceremony and then register the marriage. (The law provides that the fee for the marriage license is to be waived in these circumstances.)
Alternatively, if a couple in a civil union would rather not go through a new ceremony, for one year following the date that the marriage law becomes effective, they can simply have their civil union designated as a marriage—again, at no fee—with the date of the marriage to be recorded as the date of the original civil union.
Digestive upset can be very uncomfortable and oftentimes quite embarrassing. In many cases, digestive disorders stem from a poor diet rich in dead and processed foods. If you are one of the millions suffering from digestive problems, incorporating probiotics, enzyme, minerals and fiber-rich foods could transform your health radically.
Listed below are 5 fantastic foods that will help you to maintain and promote the right digestive balance. They will ensure that the nutrients you take in are absorbed into your body and that waste is eliminated properly. While it isn’t an exhaustive list, these foods will put you on the right path to improved health and overall well-being.
Papaya
One particular food that has amazing digestive-promoting properties is papaya. This fruit can help fix digestion problems by breaking down proteins and supporting production of digestive enzymes. While papayas are often viewed as an excellent treatment for digestive disorders as well as disturbances of the gastrointestinal tract, they also provide many more health benefits.
Cultured Foods
Cultured or fermented beverages are better than pasteurized juices and beverages, as the pasteurized juices have no enzymes or bacteria that is beneficial to your digestive tract. Fermented products may include yogurts, kimchi, sauerkraut, kefir, raw apple cider vinegar, kombucha, and nattoh, among others.
Miso Soup
A Japanese soup containing tofu, seaweed, soybeans, and other ingredients, miso soup is delectable and easy on the stomach. Tofu is easily digested, fermented soybeans help break down macronutrients, and seaweed in the soup promotes intestinal health while also improving the metabolism and and detoxifying the intestines.
Avocados
Avocados are full of beneficial fat and fiber, making them gut-friendly and easily digestible. However, consider eating raw green vegetables with avocados, as the fat in the fruit can delay the digestion of other foods in the stomach by inhibiting the secretion of gastric juices.
Beets are rich in beneficial enzymes, vitamins, and minerals, and fiber. Eating these red-purple fruit can encourage regular bowel movements, improved gut lining, and smooth muscle function. Beets are also rich in an organic compound known as betaine hydrochloride, which has been shown to create a perfect environment for digestion and help those suffering from digestive upsets. Eat beets whole or juice them!
Foreclosure crisis won't end for this US state
Florida's foreclosure crisis just won't end. More than six years after subprime lending and overbuilding led to the worst U.S. real estate slump, the state had the biggest increase in home seizures last year, and the highest foreclosure rate … Read more on Financial Post (blog)
BRIEF-CVS Caremark says US postal service decision to end Saturday delivery …
Related Topics. Stocks » · Markets » · Earnings ». CHICAGO | Wed Feb 6, 2013 9:51am EST. CHICAGO Feb 6 (Reuters) – CVS Caremark Corp : * Says U.S. postal service decision to end Saturday delivery should have. minimal impact. Stocks · Markets … Read more on Reuters
Boy Scouts of America delay vote on ending gay ban
The national board of the Boy Scouts of America has postponed a vote to end a ban on gay scouts and leaders, the youth group has said. The BSA added it would take action after a national meeting in May. Last week it said the board would consider … Read more on BBC News
The Internal Revenue Service, under pressure after admitting it targeted anti-tax Tea Party groups for scrutiny in recent years, also had its eye on at least three Democratic-leaning organizations seeking nonprofit status.
One of those groups, Emerge America, saw its tax-exempt status denied, forcing it to disclose its donors and pay some taxes. None of the Republican groups have said their applications were rejected.
But at least there’s no passive-aggressive race-baiting going on.
The United States Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit issued a ruling today in the medical marijuana reclassification case, Americans for Safe Access v. Drug Enforcement Administration. In a 2-1 decision, the Court granted standing in the case — the right to bring a claim against the federal government — but denied the legal challenge on the merits, agreeing with the government’s assertion that “adequate and well-controlled studies” on the medical efficacy of marijuana do not exist.
“To deny that sufficient evidence is lacking on the medical efficacy of marijuana is to ignore a mountain of well-documented studies that conclude otherwise,” said Joe Elford, Chief Counsel with Americans for Safe Access (ASA), the country’s leading medical marijuana advocacy organization, which appealed the denial of the rescheduling petition in January of last year.
“The Court has unfortunately agreed with the Obama Administration’s unreasonably raised bar on what qualifies as an ‘adequate and well-controlled’ study, thereby continuing their game of ‘Gotcha.’”
ASA intends to seek En Banc review by the full D.C. Circuit and,necessary, the organization will appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court.
ASA intends to argue that the Obama Administration has acted arbitrarily and capriciously by using continually changing standards of “medical efficacy” in order to maintain marijuana as a Schedule I substance, a dangerous drug with no medical value.
The government now contends that Stage II and III clinical trials are necessary to show efficacy, while ASA has consistently argued that the more than 200 peer-reviewed studies cited in the legal briefs adequately meet this standard.
In 2002, the Coalition for Rescheduling Cannabis, made up of several individuals and organizations including ASA, filed a petition to reclassify marijuana for medical use.
That petition was denied in July 2011, after ASA sued the Obama Administration for unreasonable delaying the answer.
The appeal to the D.C. Circuit was the first time in nearly 20 years that a federal court has reviewed the issue of whether adequate scientific evidence exists to reclassify marijuana.
“The Obama Administration’s legal efforts will keep marijuana out of reach for millions of qualified patients who would benefit from its use,” continued Elford.
“It’s time for President Obama to change his harmful policy with regard to medical marijuana and treat this as a public health issue, something entirely within the capability and authority of the executive office.”
Patient advocates claim that marijuana is treated unlike any other controlled substance and that politics have dominated over medical science on this issue. Advocates point to a research approval process for marijuana, controlled by the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA), which is unique, overly rigorous, and hinders meaningful therapeutic research.
ASA argues in its appeal brief that the DEA has no “license to apply different criteria to marijuana than to other drugs, ignore critical scientific data, misrepresent social science research, or rely upon unsubstantiated assumptions, as the DEA has done in this case.”
ASA will continue to put pressure on the Obama Administration, but will also be lobbying Members of Congress to reclassify marijuana for medical use.
A new comprehensive public health bill on medical marijuana is expected to be introduced soon in Congress, and ASA is holding a national conference in February to support its passage. (Source)
It’s a big decision, one we’ll all have to make: Should I take Social Security as soon as I’m eligible, at age 62, or wait till I’m 66 … or even 70, when I would receive the maximum benefit?
The answer is not as simple as you might think. And the consequences are enormous.
“It’s a decision that will be different for everyone,” says David Blanchett, head of retirement research for the Morningstar Investment Management Division.
As important as Social Security is to many people’s post-retirement finances, it’s given little thought in retirement financial planning, says Jeff Bucher, president of Citizens Advisory Group in Perrysburg, Ohio.
“Most of the time, it’s put on the back burner,” he says. “It is a huge benefit to people’s lifestyles. It is important that we look at all the options.”
“It probably is the least-evaluated decision for retirees but has more complexities than people are aware of,” says Jack Tatar, author of several books on retirement, including Safe 4 Retirement.
“Most people take it at 62,” he says. “They end up losing in the long run. If they delay it till 70, they will get 30% more. Unfortunately,” he says, “most Americans can’t do that.”
Improper timing can cost you $ 100,000 to $ 150,000 over a lifetime, says John Gajkowski, of Money Managers Financial Group in Chicago.
When should you take it?
If you delay taking Social Security, it increases your monthly benefit about 8% a year until you’re eligible for the maximum at 70. Most financial planners pretty much recommend that you do that if you can, or delay at least until age 66. But most people can’t delay.
Some quick facts:
•Many people – 41.4 % – take the benefits as soon as they’re eligible at age 62, according to Social Security Administration.
•Half of Americans 65 and older rely on Social Security for at least 50% of their family income; 23% rely on Social Security for 90% or more of their family income, according to the AARP Public Policy Institute.
•Minorities are less likely to receive benefits, and when they do, are more likely to be more dependent on them, says Gary Koenig, director of economic security in AARP’s Public Policy Institute.
Koenig says many people don’t realize how modest Social Security benefits are. “You look at the average benefit that a retired worker is getting, and it’s $ 15,000 a year,” he says. “If you wait till you’re 67 and are in the highest income group, you won’t receive more than $ 30,000 a year.”
Morningstar’s Blanchett wrote a report, “When to claim Social Security” in The Journal of Personal Finance. He said his analysis suggests that the advantages to delaying the Social Security benefits can be significant. Still, he cautions, every case is different.
“We find that females, married couples, retirees who expect to invest in relatively conservative portfolios during retirement, and retirees who have longer life expectancies are likely to benefit most from delaying Social Security benefits.
“On the other hand, retirees who have shorter life expectancies or invest more aggressively and believe they can achieve a relatively high return on their retirement portfolios would likely be better off taking Social Security earlier,” he says.
Dedrick Muhammad, senior director of the Economic Department at the NAACP, says despite the lower life expectancy for African Americans, especially men, he still recommends they delay. If you’ve already lived to be 62 or 65, your life expectancy is likely to be longer, he says.
“A lot of people can’t delay till 70 and can’t delay till 65. If that’s what your economic situation demands, then you should do that. But if you can afford to wait, then you should wait.”
Adds Tater: “There will always be the people who have to take it. If you are in a situation (where) you don’t have to take it, look at the numbers and decide.” He says there is more to it than deciding on 66 or 70. “Take a good, hard look at timing on the year and the month.”
“If you don’t think you will live long, it makes sense to claim early,” says Bucher. “The standard break-even point is 80 years old. If you don’t think you’ll live past 80, you’re better off claiming earlier. If you are married and think one of you will live past 80, it might make sense to delay,” he says.
“The most important thing about Social Security timing is there is not a one-size-fits-all,” says Gajkowski. “It’s an individual issue.” He said his firm looks at many scenarios, including genetics and life expectancy, marital status and tax considerations.
Bucher says he uses a variety of strategies to advise clients on Social Security. One is a switching strategy, which allows one spouse to claim another’s benefits. For example, he has a married client who is 67 and doesn’t need the benefits. He can claim his wife’s benefits until he’s 70, and let his own benefits continue to grow. When he turns 70, he can switch to his own benefits.
Another switching strategy: A divorced client who is 67 had been married for at least 10 years. She can claim her ex-husband’s benefits until she reaches 70, then switch to her own.
“This decision should be part of an overall plan,” Bucher says. “Many people walk by this decision without thinking twice about all the different ways we can do this. For many (financial) advisers, advising on Social Security doesn’t bring revenue. It is critical that we do. It is the foundation of many people’s income. That’s the foundation of the plan.”
“Retirement age is whenever you retire,” says Blanchett. “You can’t claim benefits before 62, and there is no reason to delay after age 70.”
Editorial writer George Hager answers this reader question. Have a question of your own? Send it to us using #askusatoday on Twitter or e-mail askusatoday@usatoday.com.
Okay, that is not exactly what he said, but if Chrystia Freeland’s account of Summers’ comments at Davos is to be believed Summers is badly misinformed about the state of the U.S. economy in 1993, when he was one of the top advisers in the Clinton administration. According to Freeland Summers said:
In 1993, here’s what the situation was: Capital costs were really high, the trade deficit was really big, and if you looked at a graph of average wages and the productivity of American workers, those two graphs lay on top of each other. So, bringing down the deficit, reducing capital costs, raising investment, spurring productivity growth, was the right and natural central strategy for spurring growth. That was what Bob Rubin advised Bill Clinton, that was the advice Bill Clinton followed, and they were right.
This is not what the data say. Here’s the story on real wages and productivity.
Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics.
There are some measurement issues that would reduce the gap somewhat, but anyone who could see these two as laying “on top of each other” needs some new glasses. The sharp divergence between productivity and wages began in the 1980s. It would be really scary if Larry Summers, Robert Rubin and the rest did not know this in 1993.
The other parts of Summers’ story are also wrong. The trade deficit was less than 1.0 percent of GDP in 1993. By comparison it was almost 4.0 percent of GDP when Clinton left office in 2000. The interest rate on ten-year Treasury bonds was 6.6 percent in January of 1993. Coupled with an inflation rate of around 3.0-3.5 percent, this gave a real interest rate in the neighborhood of 3.1-3.6 percent. This is perhaps a bit higher than desirable, but actually not much different than what we saw through most of the Clinton years.
In short, Summers is describing a history that does not exist. He either has a very poor memory or is just making things up.
Dean Baker is co-director of the Center for Economy and Policy Research. He also writes a regular blog, Beat the Press, where this post originally appeared.
I am proud of America. I love America and I love freedom. I want everyone to have equal opportunity to pursue happiness and live the American Dream. Now that President Obama has been re-elected, we are all in this together and we must fight to preserve our Constitutional Rights. I hope that Obama changes his policies because we can't afford another four years of economic disaster.
5/10/13 – Flanked by a group of women in the White House on Friday, President Barack Obama touted the benefits of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care … Category: Check Out More Videos: Obama Video Healthcare Video Select a ReactionDeep (0)...
Watch The Patterns!! We Are Being Trained Like Soldiers… Links: Jon Clem Vid: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ssTRkEmP3x0 Shelter in place google searches: … Category: Check Out More Videos: Obama Video Healthcare Video Select a ReactionDeep (0) Stimulating (0) Hardcore (0) Awesome (0) Interesting (0) I Disagree (0) Sucks (0) Check...
Courtesy of All News 106.7, WYAY-FM. http://www.youtube.com/DailyEnglishNews Daily English News Plz Subscrib for Latest News Apple’s CEO, Tim Cook is disputing assertions by a Senate panel that … Video Rating: 0 / 5 Category: Check Out More Videos: Obama Video...
Heretic Productions. Category: Check Out More Videos: Obama Video Healthcare Video Select a ReactionDeep (0) Stimulating (0) Hardcore (0) Awesome (0) Interesting (0) I Disagree (0) Sucks (0) Check out these interesting topics:May 21, 2013 -- VIDEO: The Road to World War 3 – Share this to...
http://www.therightscoop.com. Video Rating: 4 / 5 http://www.therightscoop.com. Video Rating: 4 / 5 Category: Check Out More Videos: Obama Video Healthcare Video Select a ReactionDeep (0) Stimulating (0) Hardcore (0) Awesome (0) Interesting (0) I Disagree (0) Sucks (0) Check out these interesting topics:May 16, 2013 -- VIDEO:...
Please rate and subscribe!!! Ron Paul ‘Constitutionally Correct’ 2012. http://www.ronpaulcc2012.com **Volume discounts are also available. Please contact us … Category: Check Out More Videos: Obama Video Healthcare Video Select a ReactionDeep (0) Stimulating (0) Hardcore (0) Awesome (0) Interesting (0) I Disagree (0) Sucks (0) Check out...
อัปแก้เซงครับผม. The future of America can’t do a push up. Category: Check Out More Videos: Obama Video Healthcare Video Select a ReactionDeep (0) Stimulating (0) Hardcore (0) Awesome (0) Interesting (0) I Disagree (0) Sucks (0) Check out these interesting topics:May 22, 2013 -- VIDEO: Fox News...
Last Wednesday, the Federal Reserve announced QE4 (massive money printing round 4), which along with the still ongoing QE3, guarantees BILLION of money p… Category: Check Out More Videos: Obama Video Healthcare Video Select a ReactionDeep (0) Stimulating (0) Hardcore (0) Awesome (0) Interesting (0)...
New demo song Headcrush – Cyber Wars (2012). Only music. All rights reserved Headcrush 2012. Follow us on : Facebook : http://www.facebook.com/Headcrushband … If you have the time, a like on the video would be much appreciated! As a toilet,...
For the LATEST and GREATEST in “Breaking News” and Controversies From The Nation and Around the World…Stay Tuned!! ……………………………………. The “illuminati” : “what is zionism” : “freemasons” : “anti-christ” : “all seeing eye” : The “illuminati” “what is zionism” “freemasons”...
No comments yet.